FDA

(FDA) Fundamentally Defective Agency

Over the past few decades, the Food and Drug Administration has shown itself to be either inexcusably incompetent, something much worse, or both.

Dr. David Graham, who is the Associate Director of the FDA’s Office of Drug Safety, flatly stated,

“FDA is inherently biased in favor of the pharmaceutical industry. It views industry as its client, whose interests it must represent and advance. It views its primary mission as approving as many drugs it can, regardless of whether the drugs are safe or needed”.
Documentation

There was a time when the FDA was considered the gold standard throughout the world in maintaining drug and food safety for the public. Today, however, the agency’s image is tarnished almost beyond repair. Drawing bi-partisan fire from both sides of Congress, the scientific community and within the agency itself, accusations that the FDA has become too politicized over the past several years confirms this is yet another government agency in need of major reforms that money alone won’t fix.

The credibility of the FDA took another major hit when it declared small amounts of bisphenol A, a chemical used in plastic baby bottles and canned foods, “safe” and “not a threat to infants or adults.”

They have got to be kidding!

Bisphenol A, or BPA, is a known endocrine disruptor that has been found to alter the behavior of over 200 genes. JAMA published a study examining the affects of BPA in 1455 adults ages 18-74, linking the chemical to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and clinically abnormal concentrations of three liver enzymes. The study noted that exposure to BPA occurs most often through diet, but also through “transdermal exposure and inhalation of airborne dust.” This is particularly troubling news for children, who have frequent hand-to-mouth activity and who play close to the ground where airborne dust tends to accumulate.
Documentation

Dr. Frederick vom Saal, a reproductive scientist at the University of Missouri, discovered mice were being damaged by doses of BPA that were 25,000 times below what the government considered safe. Over a 150 peer-reviewed studies determined BPA to be toxic at low doses in animal studies and could pose serious health risks to fetuses, infants and children. The chemical has been linked to numerous health problems, including reproductive problems, infertility, obesity, breast and prostate cancer and developmental problems in children.

In a study by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), researchers found that 90 percent of the participants had levels of BPA that were at or above that which caused abnormalities in animal studies.

Following the release of a 2007 draft report from the National Institutes of Health that determined there was “some concern” about possible health risks to infants, the Canadian government immediately initiated steps to ban BPA use in baby products and became the first country to label BPA “hazardous.”

Canada’s health minister, Tony Clement, told reporters the government concluded children were being put at risk from the toxic chemical, which affected fish and other aquatic life even at very low levels. “We have immediately taken action on bisphenol A because we believe it is our responsibility to ensure families, Canadians and our environment are not exposed to a potentially harmful chemical.”

John Baird, Canada’s environmental minister added, “We’re not waiting to take action to protect our people. We have concluded that it is better to be safe than sorry.”

Isn’t it reassuring to know that a chemical considered too dangerous for kids in Canada is declared “safe” for kids and still has a market in the U.S.?

Fortunately, the marketing geniuses at Walmart have more sense than the FDA. Soon after Canada announced their intentions to ban BPA, Walmart officials said they would begin removing all BPA-containing baby products from their shelves. Toys ‘R’ Us and other retailers also announced they intend to stop selling BPA products.

Confused? How could one country conclude BPA too dangerous for their citizens and another tell the public it is “safe”?

A front-page Washington Post article, “Studies on Chemical in Plastics Questioned” (April 27, 2007) explained how two countries examining the same chemical could come to two very different decisions and how industry influence may have played a role in the FDA’s announcement.
Documentation

“Tobacco figured this out, and essentially it’s the same model,” said David Michaels, who was a federal regulator in the Clinton administration. “If you fight the science, you’re able to postpone regulation and victim compensation, as well. As in this case, eventually the science becomes overwhelming. But if you can get five or ten years of avoiding pollution control or production of chemicals, you’ve greatly increased your product.”

When asked about the FDA’s position, Dr. Frederick Vom Saal said a flood of recent BPA studies have validated his work. “The scientific community basically said, ‘This argument is over,’ “ he said. “It ended a long time ago. There’s only been an illusion of a controversy created by a well-financed public relations outfit. The idea that the FDA tells people this is safe is offensive.”

Apparently the hundreds of studies by government researchers were not good enough for this FDA. Instead the agency based its opinion on two industry trade groups, the American Plastics Council (APC) and the American Chemistry Council (ACC).

“It’s ironic the FDA would choose to ignore dozens of studies funded by (the National Institutes of Health) – this country’s best scientists – and instead rely on flawed studies from industry,” said Pete Myers, chief scientist for Environmental Health Sciences. (AP: “FDA Ignores Top Scientists on Toxic Plastics Chemical” 8/15/08) or (Newsweek” BPA IS FINE, IF YOU IGNORE MOST STUDIES ABOUT IT” 3/04/15)

In other words, the multibillion-dollar plastics industry told the FDA that BPA is safe and evidently FDA officials said, “if you say so, that’s good enough for us.” This is how the system works at the FDA. They rely on industry-produced data to determine if food, drugs or medical products are safe.

As the mounting evidence against BPA grows, some members of Congress are not relying on the FDA any longer. In 2008, Senators Schumer (D-NY), Kerry (D-MA), Feinstein (D-CA), Durbin (D-IL), Clinton (D-NY) and Menendez (D-NJ) introduced the BPA-Free Kids Act of 2008 (S.2928). The bill would ban the use of BPA in products made for children under the age of 7.

At a hearing of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, Senator Schumer told the Committee that Congress must act “right here, right now. We cannot wait any longer.” Yet as of 2017, the bill has yet to pass, so I guess some Senators don’t mind waiting to protect people.

FDA’s support of BPA once again puts the agency squarely on the side of industry and at odds with countless health experts and scientists who are adamant about the serious health risks associated with the chemical.

In what many believe to be suspicious timing, the FDA decision to stand behind the safety of BPA came just before the California legislature, under siege by chemical industry lobbyists, planned to vote on legislation that would ban the chemical from baby bottles. California lawmakers rejected the bill by a vote of 31 – 27, citing the FDA endorsement. Nice work FDA.

The FDA’s position on BPA is just one in a long list of examples of how the agency is failing in its responsibility to protect the public.

It has become obvious that the public can no longer have confidence in the FDA’s opinions. Hopefully other members of Congress will agree that “we cannot wait any longer” and support the BPA bill, and we won’t need to depend on Walmart to protect our kids.

When the FDA grants approval on products marketed to consumers, the vast majority of people feel comfortable that the agency has performed its due diligence and the risk of injury or harm is non-existent.

Since its inception in 1906 as the Bureau of Chemistry, however, the FDA has been mired in an incestuous conflict-of-interest culture. Despite horrific reports on approved drugs harming and killing thousands of Americans, the public at large remains unaware of the agency’s corrupt history.

According to its mission statement, “the FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation. The FDA is also responsible for advancing the public health by helping to speed innovations that make medicines and foods more effective, safer, and more affordable; and helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines and foods to improve their health.”

While operating under the illusion of a government regulatory agency responsible for ensuring products are safe, time and time again we have witnessed the FDA acting as an agency that has abandoned the public’s interest and under the control of the very industries it is charged with regulating.

Over the past thirty years, there have been countless articles and books detailing startling revelations about the pervasive influence of industry on the regulatory process and exasperating attempts to change the strangle-hold that corporations have on the FDA.

Following three frustrating years as FDA Commissioner, Dr. Herbert Lay resigned and told the New York Times, “The thing that bugs me is that people think the FDA is protecting them. It isn’t. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it’s doing are as different as night and day.”
Documentation

In a Wall Street Journal article, “Drug Firms Use Financial Clout to Push Industry Agenda at FDA” (Sept. 1, 2006), Anna Wilde-Mathews summarized how a heavily lobbied Congress allowed the drug industry to seize more control over the FDA.

Regulators usually don’t negotiate their budgets with the industries they oversee… For most of its history, the FDA was funded entirely by Congress. But in the early 1990s, companies unhappy with the pace of drug approvals agreed to pay the FDA millions of dollars in ‘annual fees to help speed its performance. Because the industry and the agency renegotiate every five years over the size of fees – and what they,’ can be used for – drug makers can have considerable input, into which programs receive funding. Each time the arrangement has been renewed, the FDA has gained new funding. In return, industry has wrung concessions. In the 1997 deal, the review time for a standard application dropped from 12 months to 10 months. In 2002, the FDA agreed to a number of changes, including a new deadline for how fast the agency would respond to companies’ requests for meetings about their drug applications.

Herein lies the huge problem. We have a government that sees nothing wrong with this meddling and is apparently incapable of correcting it. As if this insidious collaborative arrangement weren’t bad enough, even when well-intentioned FDA scientists attempt to bring safety concerns to the attention of their superiors, they are threatened and told to keep silent or worse, change their recommendations.

It would be impossible to chronicle the sordid history of collusion and corruption of the nation’s premier regulatory agency. But a re-examination seems warranted in light of the FDA’s declaration that bisphenol A (BPA) is “safe.”, and here.

Although consumer watchdog organizations have always been critical of industry influence over government agencies and the “revolving door” relationship between the two, most Americans were not aware of the serious and systemic problems plaguing the FDA until 2003. This is when newspapers around the country reported that an FDA drug safety analyst, Dr. Andrew Mosholder, warned his superiors that children taking antidepressants like Paxil and Zoloft increased their risk of becoming suicidal.
Documentation

When the Senate Finance Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held hearings on the Mosholder revelations, drug company executives began pointing the finger back at FDA officials and blaming them for withholding information from physicians and patients. A safe thing to do, since neither are held
accountable.

(“FDA Urged Withholding Data on Antidepressants,” Washington Post, Sept. 10, 2004).
Documentation

According to the article published in the Washington Post:

Regulators suppressed the negative information on the grounds that it might scare families and physicians away from the drugs, according to testimony by drug company executives. For at least three medications, they said, the FDA blocked the companies’ plans to reveal the negative studies in drug labels, and in one case the agency reversed a manufacturer’s decision to amend its drug label to say that the drug was associated in studies with increased hostility and suicidal thinking among children… More than two-thirds of all studies of antidepressant use among depressed children have failed to show the drugs are effective.

 

By the end of 2004, criticism of the FDA intensified both in Congress and in the press.

In dramatic testimony before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, Dr. David Graham, a senior official in the FDA’s Office of Drug Safety, described the FDA as a “profound regulatory failure.” In an illuminating and disturbing interview with PBS, Dr. Graham repeated some of what he told the Senate Committee. The scientist turned government whistle-blower explained how he was pressured by his superiors to change the conclusions of his study that found 30,000 to 55,000 deaths caused by Vioxx, Merck’s blockbuster arthritis drug. When Graham refused, FDA officials withheld the public release of the full text but shared it with Merck.

“You have an agency that was completely oblivious to safety, completely insensitive to safety, that basically was willing to tolerate a 500% increased risk of heart attack with no demonstrable counter balancing benefit for the drug because it suits their clients to allow the drug to be marketed in America.”

When asked, “who is the FDA working for?” Graham replied, “A former manager of mine from the Office of Drug Safety told me that industry was our client. And when I said to him, ‘No, the public is my client’ he said, I was wrong and it was industry.”

“I would argue that the FDA, as currently configured, is incapable of protecting America against another Vioxx. We are virtually defenseless,” said Dr. Graham.

After reviewing the Vioxx clinical trials, Dr. Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote a scathing article accusing Merck and the FDA “acted out of ruthless, shortsighted and irresponsible self-interest.”

The Vioxx scandal outraged the scientific and medical community, members of Congress and the public, which brought greater scrutiny on the FDA but not much of anything else. If you think anything has changed after Dr. Graham exposed the dirty dealings within the walls of the FDA and the antidepressant and Vioxx investigations, think again.

In September 2005, citing “unwarranted interference in agency decision making” on the part of then Commissioner Lester Crawford, Susan F. Wood, assistant FDA commissioner for women’s health and director of the Office of Women’s Health, resigned from the position she had held for five years. In an email to FDA staff, Dr. Wood said, “I can no longer serve as staff when scientific and clinical evidence, fully evaluated and recommended for approval by the professional staff here, has been overruled.”

Soon after Wood’s exit, Dr. Crawford abruptly resigned as FDA Commissioner after the Wall Street Journal disclosed his stock ownership in companies regulated by the agency. Crawford later plead guilty to the conflict-of-interest charges.

Following Crawford’s plea, Mike Adams, long time FDA critic and author of “Grocery Warning,” told reporters, “Crawford’s guilty plea now establishes as indisputable fact what myself and other FDA critics have been saying for years. The agency is headed by white-collar criminals who deliberately make regulatory decisions that are in the best interests of drug companies, junk food giants, rather than protecting the health of the public.”

It is no secret that industry-funded studies were used for decades to hide the damaging affects caused by asbestos, tobacco, and lead. It is no secret that industry spends millions every year to make sure their interests are protected – at the FDA, other federal agencies and in the halls of Congress.

Whether we are talking about food, chemical or drug safety, FDA officials routinely rely upon industry-funded research as the convenient excuse for not taking action on dangerous products when safety concerns arise. This is called creating “scientific uncertainty,” and has proven quite successful in thwarting regulatory action.

For years, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has been one of the FDA’s harshest critics and a leader in pressing for FDA reforms, transparency and accountability. Having served as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee during the Vioxx and antidepressants hearings, Grassley began investigating the approval of the antibiotic drug Ketek after learning the drug was approved even though the agency knew “safety tests on the drug had been forged.” Manufactured by Sanofi-Aventis SA, Ketek was linked to 12 cases of liver failure including four deaths.

In a press release, Grassley said, “The allegations of misconduct in this [Ketek] case are as bad as I’ve heard yet. It looks like the FDA caught the drug company red-handed and let them get away with it. On top of that, the FDA failed to set the record straight and, in fact, continues to cite a discredited safety study as a principle reason to feel okay about using this drug.”
Documentation

ABC News later reported that Grassley “was sent home empty-handed” by FDA officials “who refused the powerful Republican access to information” and “wanted to speak to the FDA investigator who uncovered the fraud” about Ketek’s approval.
Documentation

“The study with the forged test results was conducted at a former weight loss clinic in Gadsden, Alabama. Dr. Maria Anne Kirkman-Campbell is serving five years in prison for falsifying safety test results on Ketek.”

“A former nurse, Michelle Snedeker, told ABC News she was ordered to forge documents and report data on people who had not even been given Ketek. The doctor was paid $400 for each of the 407 subjects that she enrolled for the study.”

 

As Grassley pressed for the denied documents, a defiant Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach, acting director of the FDA, refused to provide the information to the Senate Committee on Finance.

So much for the power of congressional oversight.

On February 12, 2007, the FDA finally announced that Ketek would get a “black box” warning. “The changes include the removal of two of the three previously approved indications — acute bacterial sinusitis and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis — from the drug’s label. The agency has determined that the balance of benefits and risks no longer support approval of the drug for these indications.” The warning also states that “Ketek is contraindicated (should not be used) in patients with myasthenia gravis, a disease that causes muscle weakness.”
Documentation

Years later The New England Journal of Medicine published an article written by a former FDA physician, David B. Ross, M.D., Ph.D., who participated in the Ketek review:
Documentation

The review of Ketek was thus marked by pronounced departures from accepted review practices. In addition to the use of fraudulent data, the substitution of uncontrolled postmarket safety reports for controlled clinical trial data, and the acceptance of trials that could not show efficacy, there was also overt internal pressure brought to bear on FDA reviewers to alter their conclusions.

But did any of these revelations change the way the FDA evaluates internal dissent regarding safety concerns? Did congressional investigations result in the agency cleaning up its act? Did von Eschenbach’s refusal to cooperate with a congressional investigation prevent him from becoming FDA Commissioner? Absolutely not.

Senior officials continue to censor and intimidate honorable scientists trying to do their jobs and committed to protecting the public.

 

Two years following Dr. Graham’s testimony before Congress, another FDA scientist, Rosemary Johann-Liang, was reprimanded when she recommended GlaxoSmithKline’s diabetes drug Avandia be given a “black box” warning label to alert physicians and consumers about its heart failure risks. Again, Johann-Liang’s supervisors refused to act on her report.

“I really advocate for drug safety, and a lot of times the agency doesn’t want to hear that there are problems. I think, in general, there is a culture of ‘the drug is always innocent,” Johann-Liang told USA Today one day before leaving her job as deputy director of the Division of Drug Risk Evaluation.
Documentation

Only after the New England Journal of Medicine published a study that found patients using Avandia doubled their risk of heart failure compared to individuals not taking the drug, did FDA officials finally accept Dr. Johann-Liang’s report and give the drug the strongest “black box” warning label. By that time, the drug had already been prescribed for millions of Americans.

In a speech on the senate floor, Senator Grassley told his colleagues that as many as 20 heart attacks a day might be caused by Avandia. Grassley has been angry and frustrated by the attitude and actions of senior FDA officials and has introduced legislation aimed at establishing an independent drug safety review board.

In reality, the last thing industry wants is FDA reform… unless it is on their terms. This is where all the lobbyists and campaign contributions are most effective. The political influence of the dirty money bestowed on lawmakers, partnered with industry’s bankrolling of the FDA from user fees, has led to catastrophic consequences to hundreds of thousands of Americans.

special-interestsIn response to on-going congressional attacks, FDA officials blame a myriad of agency failures on the lack of funding. But the problems at the FDA are not because of lack of money. Good scientists like Andrew Mosholder, David Graham, and Rosemary Johann-Liang were doing their jobs and reporting safety concerns to their superiors. Warnings could have saved thousands of lives. The problem is a lack of accountability and conscience in the FDA hierarchy who so casually turn a blind eye to dangerous and deadly drugs, chemicals and food products.

When large financial institutions fail, people lose their investments. But when the FDA fails, people lose their lives. Children lose parents. Parents lose their children. Had Dr. Graham not come forward, it is very probable the FDA would still be telling Americans Vioxx is “safe,” just as they are now proclaiming BPA “safe,” and the arthritis drug would still be on the market, quietly injuring and killing tens of thousands of unsuspecting Americans.

Federal officials who intentionally deceive the public and mislead physicians through the illegal practice of hiding data that shows children taking antidepressants have a greater risk of committing suicide, because they are concerned that the public would lose confidence in antidepressants are not regulators. They are criminals and should be treated as such.

Besides a complete overhaul, a few prosecutions might be just the medicine the FDA needs. But the puppet masters are unlikely to let that happen.

puppetmasters

media-medical-propagandaMedia Medical Propaganda

medicines-should-be-the-last-resort-not-the-firstMedicines should be the last resort, not the first

keeping-people-sick-makes-good-business-senseKeeping people sick makes good business sense

no-real-pharmaceutical-punishmentsNo real Pharmaceutical punishments

last-week-tonight-with-john-oliver_%20marketing-to-doctors-hboMarketing to Doctors

lies-of-the-fdaLies of the FDA

micheal-moore-and-the-fdaMicheal Moore and the FDA

how-the-us-government-killed-a-cancer-cureHow the US Government killed a cancer cure

government-corruption-via-big-pharmaGovernment Corruption via big pharma

natural-cancer-innovation-never-gets-research-fundingNatural cancer innovation never gets research funding

half-of-all-drugs-are-recalledHalf of all drugs are recalled

corruption-at-the-fdaCorruption at the FDA

fda-warns-vs-counterfeit-products-flooding-western-visayasFDA warns vs counterfeit products flooding Western Visayas

fda-approval-doesnt-mean-its-safeFDA approval doesnt mean its safe

fda-has-never-approved-chemo-or-radiation-for-childrenFDA has never approved chemo or radiation for children

fda-approval-is-often-based-on-conflicts-of-interestFDA approval is often based on conflicts of interest

fraudulent-drug-researchFraudulent drug research

bad-research-leads-to-drug-approvalsBad research leads to drug approvals

biased-drugs-study-resultsBiased drugs study results

big-pharma-extorts-peopleBig Pharma extorts people

Facebook
Google+
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
 

To access the drfarrahcancercenter.com site, you must agree to the following;

Terms of Use

OVERVIEW

Please read these Terms of Use carefully before accessing or using our website. By accessing or using any part of the site, you agree to be bound by these Terms of Use. If you do not agree to all the terms and conditions of this agreement, then you may not access the website or use any services.

This website is operated by private parties in the Republic of Panama. Throughout the site, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to drfarrahcancercenter.com, which offers this website, including all information, tools and services available from this site to you, the user, conditioned upon your acceptance of all terms, conditions, policies and notices stated here.

You understand and agree that you are accessing a website registered, owned, and hosted in the Republic of Panama. Therefore, all issues of a legal nature fall under the jurisdiction of the Republic of Panama legal system.

You understand and agree that as an authorized user you may only access information to which you have the legal authority to view and use. drfarrahcancercenter.com will monitor and record activity on this system to protect the system and its information and may use that monitoring information for official administrative or legal purposes. You understand and agree that you are not permitted to record, screenshot, or disseminate any information contained on the drfarrahcancercenter.com website to any party for any purpose whatsoever, and as such, you agree not to engage in such banned activities.

You understand and agree that unauthorized use of the system such as gaining unauthorized access to data, changing data, causing harm to the system or its data, or misuse of components is prohibited and may result in criminal, civil, or administrative penalties.

You also understand that drfarrahcancercenter.com can suspend or stop your use of this system if drfarrahcancercenter.com suspects any unauthorized use of the system attributable to you has occurred.

Your access to and use of the drfarrahcancercenter.com site is conditioned on your acceptance of and compliance with these Terms. These terms apply to all visitors, users and others who access or use the drfarrahcancercenter.com site. By accessing or using the drfarrahcancercenter.com site, you agree to be bound by these Terms. If you disagree with any part of the following Terms of Use, then you may not access the drfarrahcancercenter.com site.

By visiting our site and/ or purchasing anything from us, you engage in our “Service” and agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions (“Terms of Use”, “Terms”), including those additional terms and conditions and policies referenced herein and/or available by hyperlink. These Terms of Use apply to all users of the site, including without limitation users who are browsers, vendors, customers, merchants, and/ or contributors of content.

Any new features or tools which are added to the current website shall also be subject to the Terms of Use. You can review the most current version of the Terms of Use at any time on this page. We reserve the right to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use by posting updates and/or changes to our website. It is your responsibility to check this page periodically for changes. Your continued use of or access to the website following the posting of any changes constitutes acceptance of those changes.

 

SECTION 1 – ONLINE WEBSITE TERMS

By agreeing to these Terms of Use, you represent that you are at least the age of majority in your state, province, country or city of residence, or that you are the age of majority in your state, province, country or city of residence and you have given us your consent to allow any of your minor dependents to use this site.

You may not use any of our website for any illegal or unauthorized purpose nor may you, in the use of the Service, violate any laws in your jurisdiction (including but not limited to copyright laws).

You must not transmit any worms or viruses or any code of a destructive nature.

A breach or violation of any of the Terms will result in an immediate termination of your Services.

 

SECTION 2 – GENERAL CONDITIONS

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time.

You agree not to reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, resell or exploit any portion of the Service, use of the Service, or access to the Service or any contact on the website through which the service is provided, without express written permission by us.

The headings used in this agreement are included for convenience only and will not limit or otherwise affect these Terms.

You understand and agree that this website is for information purposes only, and that by providing the information contained herein, we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any type of disease or medical condition. You understand and agree that before beginning any type of natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.

You understand and agree that the information on the site is presented for the sole purpose of disseminating health information for general educational purposes only. You understand and agree that if you think you may have a medical emergency, you should call your doctor or 911. You understand and agree that the information on this site is not intended or implied to be medical advice, and you understand and agree that the information does not constitute the provision or practice of medical, nursing, or professional health care advice or services. You understand and agree that you will not use the information on this site as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. You understand and agree that you should always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health care provider prior to starting any treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.

You understand and agree that nothing contained on this site is intended to be or will be used by you for medical diagnosis or treatment. You understand and agree that you should never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking treatment based on the information contained on this site. You understand and agree that the service and any content or information contained on the site is provided on an ‘as is’ basis. You understand and agree that while efforts have been made to assure the accuracy of the information on this site, there is no guarantee that such information is accurate or up-to-date. You understand and agree that, except for information, products, or services clearly identified as being supplied by the site, the site does not operate, control, or endorse any information, products, or services on the internet, in any way.

In addition, access to this site constitutes acceptance and understanding of the following,

By accessing this system, you hereby acknowledge, consent, and agree to all listed provisions and consent to monitoring.

You understand and agree that any copyright laws pertaining to the ownership and reproduction of all data fall exclusively under Panamanian legal jurisdiction for drfarrahcancercenter.com

If you are a copyright holder, or a director, officer, owner, employee, agent, supplier, licensor, contributor, service provider, website hosting company, trade partner, heir or assign of a copyright holder and feel that you or anyone you are engaged in any form of relationship whatsoever may have rights to data as part of this site or related sites, your agreement with the terms of use constitutes the following agreement, which is mandatory in order to access the data contained on this site.

I do hereby declare, understand, agree and warrant that I am a copyright owner, or an authorized representative of a copyright owner of film, print, slide, movie, video, artwork, digital image, negatives or any other material in any format whatsoever (hereafter referred to as “COPYRIGHTED DATA”) which I believe to be, known to be, or suspect to be contained on the drfarrahcancercenter.com website.

I hereby freely grant a non-exclusive license to drfarrahcancercenter.com and its agents to reproduce these COPYRIGHT DATA in perpetuity, and I represent and warrant that I have the legal right and authority to grant such a license. I may at my discretion ask to be credited for my contribution or the contributor I represent to the drfarrahcancercenter.com site as a contributor whether this occurred with or without my knowledge, but even if I or the contributor I represent remains uncredited, this agreement shall survive since participation in the free flowing of information for the public at large is a paramount responsibility we all should share. Therefore, in the best interest of free-flowing information for the public at large, I am freely undertaking this agreement, and clearly warrant that I have the authority to do so. I agree to indemnify and hold harmless drfarrahcancercenter.com and any of its directors, officers, owners, employees, agents, suppliers, licensors, contributors, service providers, website hosting companies, trade partners, heirs and assigns from any and all liability, damages, and expenses (including reasonable actual attorney’s fees) that may incur as a result of use and publication of said material, including any claims brought by any person claiming an interest in the COPYRIGHTED DATA or their subject matter. I agree and warrant that anyone containing any format of data from drfarrahcancercenter.com contained in any medium outside of the drfarrahcancercenter.com website itself, is bound by this agreement, since acceptance of this agreement is the only way to legally access such data. In addition, I understand and agree that accessing or storing any format of data contained in any medium outside of the drfarrahcancercenter.com website where it is hosted, constitutes a violation of the copyright laws of Panama against the offending party. I understand and agree that if I copy, contain, possess, or transmit any such data from the drfarrahcancercenter.com site in any format outside of the website itself, that my possession of such materials is a violation of Panamanian laws, and I agree to destroy such data forthwith.

 

SECTION 3 – ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS AND TIMELINESS OF INFORMATION

We are not responsible if information made available on this site is not accurate, complete or current. The material on this site is provided for general information only and should not be relied upon or used as the sole basis for making decisions without consulting primary, more accurate, more complete or more timely sources of information. Any reliance on the material on this site is at your own risk.

This site may contain certain historical information. Historical information, necessarily, is not current and is provided for your reference only. We reserve the right to modify the contents of this site at any time, but we have no obligation to update any information on our site. You agree that it is your responsibility to monitor changes to our site.

 

SECTION 4 – MODIFICATIONS TO THE SERVICE

We reserve the right at any time to modify or discontinue the Service (or any part or content thereof) without notice at any time.

We shall not be liable to you or to any third-party for any modification, change, suspension or discontinuance of the Service.

 

SECTION 5 – OPTIONAL TOOLS

Any use by you of optional tools offered through the site is entirely at your own risk and discretion and you should ensure that you are familiar with and approve of the terms on which tools are provided by the relevant third-party provider(s).

We may also, in the future, offer new services and/or features through the website (including, the release of new tools and resources). Such new features and/or services shall also be subject to these Terms of Use.

 

SECTION 6 – THIRD-PARTY LINKS

Certain content, products and services available via our Service may include materials from third-parties.

Third-party links on this site may direct you to third-party websites that are not affiliated with us. We are not responsible for examining or evaluating the content or accuracy and we do not warrant and will not have any liability or responsibility for any third-party materials or websites, or for any other materials, products, or services of third-parties.

We are not liable for any harm or damages related to the purchase or use of goods, services, resources, content, or any other transactions made in connection with any third-party websites. Please review carefully the third-party’s policies and practices and make sure you understand them before you engage in any transaction. Complaints, claims, concerns, or questions regarding third-party products should be directed to the third-party.

 

SECTION 7 – USER COMMENTS, FEEDBACK AND OTHER SUBMISSIONS

If, at our request, you send certain specific submissions (for example contest entries) or without a request from us you send creative ideas, suggestions, proposals, plans, or other materials, whether online, by email, by postal mail, or otherwise (collectively, ‘comments’), you agree that we may, at any time, without restriction, edit, copy, publish, distribute, translate and otherwise use in any medium any comments that you forward to us. We are and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any comments in confidence; (2) to pay compensation for any comments; or (3) to respond to any comments.

We may, but have no obligation to, monitor, edit or remove content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, pornographic, obscene or otherwise objectionable or violates any party’s intellectual property or these Terms of Use.

You agree that your comments will not violate any right of any third-party, including copyright, trademark, privacy, personality or other personal or proprietary right. You further agree that your comments will not contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, abusive or obscene material, or contain any computer virus or other malware that could in any way affect the operation of the Service or any related website. You may not use a false e-mail address, pretend to be someone other than yourself, or otherwise mislead us or third-parties as to the origin of any comments. You are solely responsible for any comments you make and their accuracy. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any comments posted by you or any third-party.

 

SECTION 8 – ERRORS, INACCURACIES AND OMISSIONS

Occasionally there may be information on our site or in the Service that contains typographical errors, inaccuracies or omissions that may relate to product descriptions, pricing, promotions, offers, product shipping charges, transit times and availability. We reserve the right to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions, and to change or update information or cancel orders if any information in the Service or on any related website is inaccurate at any time without prior notice (including after you have submitted your order).

We undertake no obligation to update, amend or clarify information in the Service or on any related website, including without limitation, pricing information, except as required by law. No specified update or refresh date applied in the Service or on any related website, should be taken to indicate that all information in the Service or on any related website has been modified or updated.

 

SECTION 9 – PROHIBITED USES

In addition to other prohibitions as set forth in the Terms of Use, you are prohibited from using the site or its content: (a) for any unlawful purpose; (b) to solicit others to perform or participate in any unlawful acts; (c) to violate any international, federal, provincial or state regulations, rules, laws, or local ordinances; (d) to infringe upon or violate our intellectual property rights or the intellectual property rights of others; (e) to harass, abuse, insult, harm, defame, slander, disparage, intimidate, or discriminate based on gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, race, age, national origin, or disability; (f) to submit false or misleading information; (g) to upload or transmit viruses or any other type of malicious code that will or may be used in any way that will affect the functionality or operation of the Service or of any related website, other websites, or the Internet; (h) to collect or track the personal information of others; (i) to spam, phish, pharm, pretext, spider, crawl, or scrape; (j) for any obscene or immoral purpose; or (k) to interfere with or circumvent the security features of the Service or any related website, other websites, or the Internet. We reserve the right to terminate your use of the Service or any related website for violating any of the prohibited uses.

 

SECTION 10 – DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

We do not guarantee, represent or warrant that your use of our service will be uninterrupted, timely, secure or error-free.

We do not warrant that the results that may be obtained from the use of the service will be accurate or reliable.

You agree that from time to time we may remove the service for indefinite periods of time or cancel the service at any time, without notice to you.

You expressly agree that your use of, or inability to use, the service is at your sole risk. The service and all products and services delivered to you through the service are (except as expressly stated by us) provided ‘as is’ and ‘as available’ for your use, without any representation, warranties or conditions of any kind, either express or implied, including all implied warranties or conditions of merchantability, merchantable quality, fitness for a particular purpose, durability, title, and non-infringement.

In no case shall anyone affiliated with drfarrahcancercenter.com including our directors, officers, employees, affiliates, agents, contractors, interns, suppliers, service providers or licensors be liable for any injury, loss, claim, or any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special, or consequential damages of any kind, including, without limitation lost profits, lost revenue, lost savings, loss of data, replacement costs, or any similar damages, whether based in contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, arising from your use of any of the service or any products procured using the service, or for any other claim related in any way to your use of the service or any product, including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in any content, or any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of the service or any content (or product) posted, transmitted, or otherwise made available via the service, even if advised of their possibility. Because some states or jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or the limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages, in such states or jurisdictions, our liability shall be limited to the maximum extent permitted by law.

You understand and agree that no singular individual, group of individuals or entity in any form whatsoever is responsible or liable in any manner for any content generated on, for, or as a result of the existence of this site, since this is a community generated site. You understand and agree that as this is a community generated site, and as a result of this, there is no good way to control what users and contributors post on or through the sites and drfarrahcancercenter.com cannot be responsible for any offensive, inappropriate, obscene, unlawful, infringing or otherwise objectionable or even illegal user generated content you may encounter on the sites or, in connection with your use of the sites.

You understand and agree with the following statement made on behalf of drfarrahcancercenter.com, “We, on behalf of our directors, officers, employees, agents, suppliers, licensors, contributors and service providers, exclude and disclaim liability for any losses and expenses of whatever nature and howsoever arising including, without limitation, any direct, indirect, general, special, punitive, incidental or consequential damages; loss of use: loss of data; loss caused by a virus: loss of income or profit: loss of or damage to property: loss of life: claims of third parties: or other losses of any kind or character, or the inability to use, the site or the content even if we have been advised of the possibility of such damages or losses, arising out of or in connection with the use of this site or any web site with which it is linked.”

 

SECTION 11 – INDEMNIFICATION

You agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless drfarrahcancercenter.com and our parent, subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, officers, directors, agents, contractors, licensors, service providers, subcontractors, suppliers, interns and employees, harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, made by any third-party due to or arising out of your breach of these Terms of Use or the documents they incorporate by reference, or your violation of any law or the rights of a third-party.

 

SECTION 12 – SEVERABILITY

In the event that any provision of these Terms of Use is determined to be unlawful, void or unenforceable, such provision shall nonetheless be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, and the unenforceable portion shall be deemed to be severed from these Terms of Use, such determination shall not affect the validity and enforceability of any other remaining provisions.

 

SECTION 13 – TERMINATION

The obligations and liabilities of the parties incurred prior to the termination date shall survive the termination of this agreement for all purposes.

These Terms of Use are effective unless and until terminated by us. You may terminate use of the drfarrahcancercenter.com site, but this Terms of Use shall survive in perpetuity.

If in our sole judgment you fail, or we suspect that you have failed, to comply with any term or provision of these Terms of Use, we also may terminate this agreement at any time without notice and you will remain liable for all amounts due up to and including the date of termination; and/or accordingly may deny you access to our Services (or any part thereof).

 

SECTION 14 – ENTIRE AGREEMENT

The failure of us to exercise or enforce any right or provision of these Terms of Use shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision.

These Terms of Use and any policies or operating rules posted by us on this site or in respect to The Service constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between you and us and govern your use of the Service, superseding any prior or contemporaneous agreements, communications and proposals, whether oral or written, between you and us (including, but not limited to, any prior versions of the Terms of Use).

Any ambiguities in the interpretation of these Terms of Use shall not be construed against the drafting party.

 

SECTION 15 – GOVERNING LAW

These Terms of Use and any separate agreements whereby we provide you Services shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Panama.

 

SECTION 16 – CHANGES TO TERMS OF USE

You can review the most current version of the Terms of Use at any time at this page.

We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to update, change or replace any part of these Terms of Use by posting updates and changes to our website. It is your responsibility to check our website periodically for changes. Your continued use of or access to our website or the Service following the posting of any changes to these Terms of Use constitutes acceptance of those changes.

 

SECTION 17 – CONTACT INFORMATION

Questions about the Terms of Use should be sent to us at staff@drfarrahcancercenter.com

Upon agreeing to these terms and conditions, you gain access to the drfarrahcancercenter.com website and assume total responsibility for any and all actions undertaken by you as a result of your access to the drfarrahcancercenter.com website. You agree and understand that the terms of this agreement shall be binding upon you, your respective heirs, successors, assigns and legal representatives. You understand and agree that all provisions of this Terms of Use agreement that by their nature should survive termination shall survive termination, including, without limitation, ownership provisions, warranty disclaimers, indemnity, licensing in perpetuity and limitations of liability.